[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171209215422.GN21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:54:22 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: handle shrinker registration failure in
sget_userns
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 08:59:22PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 23-11-17 14:55:40, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:35:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > Hopefully less screwed version. But as I've said I am not really
> > > > familiar with the code and do not feel competent to change it so please
> > > > be very careful here. I've moved the shrinker registration to
> > > > alloc_super which turned out to be simpler.
> > >
> > > I don't get it. Why the hell do we need all that PITA in the first place?
> > > Just make sget_userns() end with
> > > if (unlikely(regsiter_shrinker(&s->s_shrink) != 0)) {
> > > deactivate_locked_super(s);
> > > s = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > }
> > > return s;
> > > and be done with that. All there is to it...
> >
> > Al, do you plan to push this fix? Tetsuo's unregister_shrinker
> > fortification is already in the mmotm tree.
>
> Is it in any git branch I could pull from? Or I could just throw it
> into vfs.git#for-linus before the fix above - up to you, folks...
Actually, looking at mmotm... I don't see it there. Which patch
is it in?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists