[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171209000157.vxqxzcx6gzy7cv2q@angband.pl>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 01:01:57 +0100
From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: bskeggs@...hat.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/imem/nv50: fix incorrect use of refcount API
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:30:34PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Commit be55287aa5b ("drm/nouveau/imem/nv50: embed nvkm_instobj directly
> into nv04_instobj") introduced some new calls to the refcount api to
> the nv50 mapping code. In one particular instance, it does the
> following:
>
> if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&iobj->maps)) {
> ...
> refcount_inc(&iobj->maps);
> }
>
> i.e., it calls refcount_inc() to increment the refcount when it is known
> to be zero, which is explicitly forbidden by the API. Instead, use
> refcount_set() to set it to 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> ---
Awesome! Works for me.
> Apologies if this was already found and fixed. I don't usually follow
> the DRM or nouveau mailing lists.
I see nothing relevant in dri-devel and nouveau archives, except my
complaint (GTX 560 Ti (GF114)):
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2017-December/029264.html
and Richard Narron seconding it (MSI GeForce 210):
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2017-December/029276.html
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> index 1ba7289684aa..db48a1daca0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ nv50_instobj_acquire(struct nvkm_memory *memory)
> iobj->base.memory.ptrs = &nv50_instobj_fast;
> else
> iobj->base.memory.ptrs = &nv50_instobj_slow;
> - refcount_inc(&iobj->maps);
> + refcount_set(&iobj->maps, 1);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&imem->subdev.mutex);
> --
I'm just a dumb user here, my tags don't carry a weight, but Tested-by:.
Meow!
--
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists