[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1575331.Q2WhDFQurN@pebbles>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:53:42 +0100
From: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] iio: adc: ina2xx: Remove unneeded dummy read to clear CNVR flag
On Sunday, December 10, 2017 6:27:33 PM CET Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:41:48 +0100
>
> Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de> wrote:
> > Although the datasheet states the CNVR flag is cleared by reading the
> > BUS_VOLTAGE register, it is actually cleared by reading any of the
> > voltage/current/power registers.
> >
> > The behaviour has been confirmed by TI support:
> > http://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers/current-shunt-monitors/f/931/p/647053
> > /2378282
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>
>
> I haven't checked the code thoroughly so there may well be something
> stopping it but have you checked the case where the only channel enabled is
> the timestamp?
>
> Obviously it makes little sense, but IIRC there is nothing in the core
> preventing that happening.
The timestamp is completely unrelated to the status register, so I fail to
understand your question. Can you please clarify?
This only removes a redundant read.
All channel combinations (w/ and w/o timestamp) work, but combinations not
including the power register use less bus time now.
Kind regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen
home: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists