linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fs: handle shrinker registration failure in sget

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171210100515.GZ20234@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:05:15 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:     viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, david@...morbit.com, jack@...e.cz,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: handle shrinker registration failure in
 sget_userns

On Sun 10-12-17 11:33:18, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 08:59:22PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 23-11-17 14:55:40, Al Viro wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:35:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > > Hopefully less screwed version.  But as I've said I am not really
> > > > > > familiar with the code and do not feel competent to change it so please
> > > > > > be very careful here. I've moved the shrinker registration to
> > > > > > alloc_super which turned out to be simpler.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't get it.  Why the hell do we need all that PITA in the first place?
> > > > > Just make sget_userns() end with
> > > > > 	if (unlikely(regsiter_shrinker(&s->s_shrink) != 0)) {
> > > > > 		deactivate_locked_super(s);
> > > > > 		s = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > > > 	}
> > > > > 	return s;
> > > > > and be done with that.  All there is to it...
> > > > 
> > > > Al, do you plan to push this fix? Tetsuo's unregister_shrinker
> > > > fortification is already in the mmotm tree.
> > > 
> > > Is it in any git branch I could pull from?  Or I could just throw it
> > > into vfs.git#for-linus before the fix above - up to you, folks...
> > 
> > Actually, looking at mmotm...  I don't see it there.  Which patch
> > is it in?
> > 
> 
> My unregister_shrinker() fortification patch
> ( http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511523385-6433-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp )
> is not yet in the mmotm tree due to disagreement between Michal and I, but
> you can throw your sget_userns() patch into vfs.git#for-linus anyway.
> We will eventually apply unregister_shrinker() fortification patch.

I've acked the patch http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171124122148.qevmiogh3pzr4zix@dhcp22.suse.cz
I disagreed with your must_check patch which has nothing to do with the
patch disussed here. I've also suggested some changelog clarifications.
Please repost and I am pretty sure Andew will pick it up.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs