linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] mmap.2: MAP_FIXED updated documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171210103147.GC20234@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:31:47 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     john.hubbard@...il.com
Cc:     Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmap.2: MAP_FIXED updated documentation

On Tue 05-12-17 19:14:34, john.hubbard@...il.com wrote:
> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> 
> Previously, MAP_FIXED was "discouraged", due to portability
> issues with the fixed address. In fact, there are other, more
> serious issues. Also, alignment requirements were a bit vague.
> So:
> 
>     -- Expand the documentation to discuss the hazards in
>        enough detail to allow avoiding them.
> 
>     -- Mention the upcoming MAP_FIXED_SAFE flag.
> 
>     -- Enhance the alignment requirement slightly.
> 
> Some of the wording is lifted from Matthew Wilcox's review
> (the "Portability issues" section). The alignment requirements
> section uses Cyril Hrubis' wording, with light editing applied.
> 
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Suggested-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>

Would you mind if I take this patch and resubmit it along with my
MAP_FIXED_SAFE (or whatever name I will end up with) next week?

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

> ---
> 
> Changes since v3:
> 
>     -- Removed the "how to use this safely" part, and
>        the SHMLBA part, both as a result of Michal Hocko's
>        review.
> 
>     -- A few tiny wording fixes, at the not-quite-typo level.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> 
>     -- Fixed up the "how to use safely" example, in response
>        to Mike Rapoport's review.
> 
>     -- Changed the alignment requirement from system page
>        size, to SHMLBA. This was inspired by (but not yet
>        recommended by) Cyril Hrubis' review.
> 
>     -- Formatting: underlined /proc/<pid>/maps 
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 
>     -- Covered topics recommended by Matthew Wilcox
>        and Jann Horn, in their recent review: the hazards
>        of overwriting pre-exising mappings, and some notes
>        about how to use MAP_FIXED safely.
> 
>     -- Rewrote the commit description accordingly.
> 
>  man2/mmap.2 | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/mmap.2 b/man2/mmap.2
> index 385f3bfd5..56b05cff1 100644
> --- a/man2/mmap.2
> +++ b/man2/mmap.2
> @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ Don't interpret
>  .I addr
>  as a hint: place the mapping at exactly that address.
>  .I addr
> -must be a multiple of the page size.
> -If the memory region specified by
> +must be suitably aligned: for most architectures a multiple of page
> +size is sufficient; however, some architectures may impose additional
> +restrictions. If the memory region specified by
>  .I addr
>  and
>  .I len
> @@ -222,8 +223,39 @@ part of the existing mapping(s) will be discarded.
>  If the specified address cannot be used,
>  .BR mmap ()
>  will fail.
> -Because requiring a fixed address for a mapping is less portable,
> -the use of this option is discouraged.
> +.IP
> +This option is extremely hazardous (when used on its own) and moderately
> +non-portable.
> +.IP
> +Portability issues: a process's memory map may change significantly from one
> +run to the next, depending on library versions, kernel versions and random
> +numbers.
> +.IP
> +Hazards: this option forcibly removes pre-existing mappings, making it easy
> +for a multi-threaded process to corrupt its own address space.
> +.IP
> +For example, thread A looks through
> +.I /proc/<pid>/maps
> +and locates an available
> +address range, while thread B simultaneously acquires part or all of that same
> +address range. Thread A then calls mmap(MAP_FIXED), effectively overwriting
> +the mapping that thread B created.
> +.IP
> +Thread B need not create a mapping directly; simply making a library call
> +that, internally, uses
> +.I dlopen(3)
> +to load some other shared library, will
> +suffice. The dlopen(3) call will map the library into the process's address
> +space. Furthermore, almost any library call may be implemented using this
> +technique.
> +Examples include brk(2), malloc(3), pthread_create(3), and the PAM libraries
> +(http://www.linux-pam.org).
> +.IP
> +Newer kernels
> +(Linux 4.16 and later) have a
> +.B MAP_FIXED_SAFE
> +option that avoids the corruption problem; if available, MAP_FIXED_SAFE
> +should be preferred over MAP_FIXED.
>  .TP
>  .B MAP_GROWSDOWN
>  This flag is used for stacks.
> -- 
> 2.15.1
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs