[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a38ynNdqeE_1EVMpSxgmCAsC_rAHiMfHv3rxjWwka4H+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:53:54 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>, Xo Wang <xow@...gle.com>,
Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] dt-bindings: clock: Add ASPEED constants
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> +#define ASPEED_NUM_CLKS 35
Why is this part of the ABI? What if they ever come out with a new
chip that needs
one more clock and you can't change it?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists