[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2psgOYZEgO8O3H_xxpDTNd=ESJpSf4bs9kf0nPvKYqtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:58:42 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>, Xo Wang <xow@...gle.com>,
Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] ARM: dts: aspeed-g4: Correct VUART IRQ number
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> This should have always been 8.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
As this is a bugfix, should we backport it to stable kernels? When you
fix a bug,
I generally recommend including a 'Fixes' tag with the commit ID of the patch
that introduced the problem, and either a 'Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org' tag
if you want it backported, or an explanation in the changelog why it should
not get backported. This really helps Greg and the other stable maintainers
trying to make a decision what to backport and what not.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists