[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171211083328.GE25177@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:03:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] cpufreq: dt: Reintroduce independent_clocks
platform data
On 08-12-17, 15:12, Sricharan R wrote:
> The Platform data was removed earlier by,
> 'commit eb96924acddc ("cpufreq: dt: Kill platform-data")'
> since there were no users at that time.
> Now this is required when the each of the cpu clocks
> can be scaled independently, which is the case
> for krait cores. So reintroduce it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Nack. This information should come from the OPP layer (Hint:
dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus()).
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists