[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512984860.5315.17.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:34:20 +0200
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jason Ekstrand <jason@...kstrand.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use copy_from_user() in fence
copying
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 12:28 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> There's no good reason to separate the access_ok() from the copy,
> especially since the access_ok() size is hard-coded instead of using
> sizeof(). Instead, just use copy_from_user() directly.
>
> Fixes: cf6e7bac6357 ("drm/i915: Add support for drm syncobjs")
There's been request to reduce the amount of Fixes: tags that are not
actually fixing bugs. This seems more like an optimization.
References: has been suggested for these cases instead.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists