[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ea85e80-f7a7-eeff-18c2-206281b74ea5@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:48:29 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] target: tcm_loop: Use seq_puts() in tcm_loop_show_info()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:01:57 +0100
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
Thus fix the affected source code place.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c b/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
index ec01070bbb40..9cd4ffe76c07 100644
--- a/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
+++ b/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void tcm_loop_release_cmd(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
static int tcm_loop_show_info(struct seq_file *m, struct Scsi_Host *host)
{
- seq_printf(m, "tcm_loop_proc_info()\n");
+ seq_puts(m, "tcm_loop_proc_info()\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists