linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712111206040.1699@nanos>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:06:55 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small
> > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire
> > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected patch) is a bit
> > annoying.
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1712081129450.1840@nanos

Another question. Is this broken on mainline or just with your new bits
targeted for next?

Thanks,

	tglx