linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V15 00/22] mmc: Add Command Queue support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFo8TKPDDy-0UhaucEWwwcgJzpEP30+WpKeRR8_2FopN4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:28:49 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
        Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
        Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
        Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
        Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
        Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
        Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/22] mmc: Add Command Queue support

On 29 November 2017 at 16:47, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On 29 November 2017 at 14:40, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here is V15 of the hardware command queue patches without the software
>> command queue patches, now using blk-mq and now with blk-mq support for
>> non-CQE I/O.
>
> I have applied patches 1->19 for next.  Deferring patch 21->23 for a while.

We haven't got any reports about big regressions, I think this looks solid!

So, I have decided to apply 21->23 for next as well.

[...]

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe