[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30a8a0b5-bd46-9e6f-e534-205a7c00ebe2@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:54:23 +0530
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] cpufreq: dt: Reintroduce independent_clocks
platform data
Hi Viresh,
On 12/11/2017 2:03 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-12-17, 15:12, Sricharan R wrote:
>> The Platform data was removed earlier by,
>> 'commit eb96924acddc ("cpufreq: dt: Kill platform-data")'
>> since there were no users at that time.
>> Now this is required when the each of the cpu clocks
>> can be scaled independently, which is the case
>> for krait cores. So reintroduce it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 7 ++++++-
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Nack. This information should come from the OPP layer (Hint:
> dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus()).
>
Thanks. Understand. As replied on the other patch, after using
dev_pm_opp_set_prop_name and opp-v2 bindings, this patch is no more
required.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists