[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hvahdjisp.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:06:30 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Mark <broonie@...nel.org>,
Pierre <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
patches.audio@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, plai@...eaurora.org,
Sudheer Papothi <spapothi@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/15] soundwire: Add MIPI DisCo property helpers
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:00:22 +0100,
Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:47:00 +0100,
> > Vinod Koul wrote:
> > >
> > > + /* TODO: Read audio mode */
> > > +
> > > + i++;
> > > + }
> >
> > Don't we use count argument for a sanity check?
>
> Not really as that iterator runs on each bit:
>
> for_each_set_bit(bit, &addr, 32) {
>
> so it will not go on endlessly and can max out when all the bits being set
> and stop.
Yes, that shouldn't happen. OTOH, only looking at the callee side,
one may wonder that the possible error would be dpn[] overflows the
given array size (=count). Though, looking at both caller and callee,
one realizes that it shouldn't happen, too.
(But then again wonders why passing count argument at all :)
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists