[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c354709d-6774-8ad5-7cc9-dbfb789ba0d2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:15:35 +0800
From: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: drop I/O permission bitmaps
On 2017/12/09 00:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.12.2017 11:22, Quan Xu wrote:
>> From: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
>>
>> Since KVM removes the only I/O port 0x80 bypass on Intel hosts,
>> clear CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS and set CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING
>> bit. Then these I/O permission bitmaps are not used at all, so
>> drop I/O permission bitmaps.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 17 +----------------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index 2fd9a8c..3e4f760 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -771,8 +771,6 @@ enum segment_cache_field {
>> FIELD(HOST_FS_SELECTOR, host_fs_selector),
>> FIELD(HOST_GS_SELECTOR, host_gs_selector),
>> FIELD(HOST_TR_SELECTOR, host_tr_selector),
>> - FIELD64(IO_BITMAP_A, io_bitmap_a),
>> - FIELD64(IO_BITMAP_B, io_bitmap_b),
>> FIELD64(MSR_BITMAP, msr_bitmap),
>> FIELD64(VM_EXIT_MSR_STORE_ADDR, vm_exit_msr_store_addr),
>> FIELD64(VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_ADDR, vm_exit_msr_load_addr),
>> @@ -943,8 +941,6 @@ static bool nested_vmx_is_page_fault_vmexit(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock);
>>
>> enum {
>> - VMX_IO_BITMAP_A,
>> - VMX_IO_BITMAP_B,
>> VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY,
>> VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LONGMODE,
>> VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY_X2APIC_APICV,
>> @@ -958,8 +954,6 @@ enum {
>>
>> static unsigned long *vmx_bitmap[VMX_BITMAP_NR];
>>
>> -#define vmx_io_bitmap_a (vmx_bitmap[VMX_IO_BITMAP_A])
>> -#define vmx_io_bitmap_b (vmx_bitmap[VMX_IO_BITMAP_B])
>> #define vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy (vmx_bitmap[VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY])
>> #define vmx_msr_bitmap_longmode (vmx_bitmap[VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LONGMODE])
>> #define vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy_x2apic_apicv (vmx_bitmap[VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY_X2APIC_APICV])
>> @@ -3632,7 +3626,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
>> #endif
>> CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING |
>> CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING |
>> - CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS |
>> + CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
>> CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING |
>> CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETING |
>> CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING |
>> @@ -5445,10 +5439,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>> #endif
>> int i;
>>
>> - /* I/O */
>> - vmcs_write64(IO_BITMAP_A, __pa(vmx_io_bitmap_a));
>> - vmcs_write64(IO_BITMAP_B, __pa(vmx_io_bitmap_b));
>> -
>> if (enable_shadow_vmcs) {
>> vmcs_write64(VMREAD_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmread_bitmap));
>> vmcs_write64(VMWRITE_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmwrite_bitmap));
>> @@ -6751,14 +6741,9 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - vmx_io_bitmap_b = (unsigned long *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>> memset(vmx_vmread_bitmap, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>> memset(vmx_vmwrite_bitmap, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>> - memset(vmx_io_bitmap_a, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>> -
>> - memset(vmx_io_bitmap_b, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>> -
>> memset(vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>> memset(vmx_msr_bitmap_longmode, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>>
> Looks good to me.
David, thanks for your review.
>
> We could now also drop
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index a5d2856eb28b..732e93332f4c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -10639,7 +10639,6 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
> * Rather, exit every time.
> */
> exec_control &= ~CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS;
> - exec_control |= CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING;
>
> vmcs_write32(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, exec_control);
>
> As this will be implicitly set by vmx_exec_control()
>
good catch.
yes, L0 merge vmcs01 with vmcsl2 to create vmcs02 and run L2.
however as this code is related to nested virtualization, I better
introduce it in another new patch
with "KVM: NVMX" prefix subject after this patch is applied.
furthermore, I think I could drop these tow lines in another new patch:
- exec_control &= ~CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS;
- exec_control |= CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING;
as the CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS is clear after this patch.
Quan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists