linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.1.46-rt52

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171211212333.GB19068@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:23:33 -0600
From:   Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>
To:     Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...mens.com>,
        <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.1.46-rt52

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:01:39PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 12/11/2017 02:20 PM, Julia Cartwright wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:04:58PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
[..]
> > > > 
> > > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2):
> > > >         PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier (fixup)
> > > This change breaks the compile of 4.1 on ARM (and other things using
> > > kernel/cpu_pm.c).
> > > 
> > > rcu_irq_enter_irqson() and friends doesn't exist in 4.1.  In fact,
> > > rcu_irq_enter() doesn't even exist.
> > > 
> > > Sorry I didn't get to testing this earlier, I've been focused on other things.
> > Thanks!  My current builds apparently don't currently cover CPU_PM
> > builds, so I didn't see this :(.  Thanks for the report.
> > 
> > v4.1 does contain rcu_irq_enter(), and it looks like what we should be
> > using in 4.1 instead.
> 
> Ah, it does, I looked in the wrong place.
> 
> > I'm thinking the below should be okay; I'll be standing up a proper cpu
> > hotplugging test to give it some runtime.
> 
> The below should work.  You'll need an ARM64, ARM or MIPS system with
> the proper config settings to exercise this code, though.

Shouldn't be a problem, I've got an ARM64 board that I've been meaning
to integrate into my testing anyway.

Thanks,
   Julia