[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171211214457.GA28858@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:44:57 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, me@...in.cc,
idosch@...lanox.com, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
1715609@...s.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][4.13.y][4.14.y][v4.15.y] net: reduce
skb_warn_bad_offload() noise
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:25:26PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Note that UFO was removed in 4.14 and that skb_warn_bad_offload
> can happen for various types of packets, so there may be multiple
> independent bug reports. I'm investigating two other non-UFO reports
> just now.
Meta-comment, now that UFO is gone from mainline, I'm wondering if I
should just delete it from 4.4 and 4.9 as well. Any objections for
that? I'd like to make it easy to maintain these kernels for a while,
and having them diverge like this, with all of the issues around UFO,
seems like it will just make life harder for myself if I leave it in.
Any opinions?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists