[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXeN3fF_ZUVeKLEYnDy25bd0+D7DgK3eLA3rVv3dEv6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:49:11 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Ronald Tschalaer <ronald@...ovation.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_serdev: Init hci_uart proto_lock to avoid oops
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
>> John Stultz reports a boot time crash with the HiKey board (which uses
>> hci_serdev) occurring in hci_uart_tx_wakeup(). That function is
>> contained in hci_ldisc.c, but also called from the newer hci_serdev.c.
>> It acquires the proto_lock in struct hci_uart and it turns out that we
>> forgot to init the lock in the serdev code path, thus causing the crash.
>>
>> John bisected the crash to commit 67d2f8781b9f ("Bluetooth: hci_ldisc:
>> Allow sleeping while proto locks are held"), but the issue was present
>> before and the commit merely exposed it. (Perhaps by luck, the crash
>> did not occur with rwlocks.)
>>
>> Init the proto_lock in the serdev code path to avoid the oops.
>>
[snip]
> patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
Sorry to be a nuisance if its just a timing thing, but I wanted to
follow up on this just to make sure it didn't fall through the cracks,
as I noticed w/ -rc3 it hasn't landed yet.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists