[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171211145239.25455568@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:52:39 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mux: add overview and add to driver-api docs
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:29:41 +0100
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
> Don't know if this is worth adding, but it might answer at least a few
> questions.
>
> It looks ok when I view the htmldocs output, but I'm not all that certain
> this is good to go?
Almost, but I have one request: the new mux.rst file is rather
unenlightening for somebody who reads it directly in the docs tree. If
you want to keep the bulk of the text in the source I can live with that,
but can mux.rst at least get an introductory paragraph saying what it
covers (what *is* the mux subsystem?) and why readers might want to go
find the rest?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists