linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: rcar: Misc error path fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:10:05 +0000
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Harunobu Kurokawa <harunobu.kurokawa.dn@...esas.com>,
        Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI: rcar: Misc error path fixes

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:16:58AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:15:18AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > 	Hi Simon, Lorenzo, Bjorn,
> > 
> > This patch series fixes two issues in the error path for the R-Car PCIe
> > host bridge driver.
> > 
> > The first issue is triggered easily by not having a PCIe card inserted,
> > and may cause a crash.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Geert Uytterhoeven (2):
> >   PCI: rcar: Fix use-after-free in probe error path
> >   PCI: rcar: Handle rcar_pcie_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() failures
> > 
> >  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 11 +++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> The first fixes ddd535f1ea3eb27e, which appeared in v4.14-rc1.  The
> second fixes 5d2917d469faab72, which appeared in v4.5-rc1.
> 
> After the merge window I normally just pull in critical fixes and
> fixes to things we merged during the window.
> 
> I think the first makes sense for v4.15 because it can cause a crash
> with no obvious way to debug it.  The second one feels like v4.16
> material to me.
> 
> Thoughts?  We're trying to sort out how to handle this sort of thing
> between Lorenzo and myself, so I apologize for the confusion here.

This sounds absolutely reasonable for me.

Thanks !
Lorenzo