lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5A301D4C.6070906@arm.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:17:48 +0000 From: James Morse <james.morse@....com> To: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com> CC: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, huangshaoyu@...wei.com, wuquanming@...wei.com, linuxarm@...wei.com Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] arm64: fault: avoid send SIGBUS two times Hi Dongjiu Geng, On 11/12/17 16:05, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > do_sea() calls arm64_notify_die() which will always signal > user-space. It also returns whether APEI claimed the external > abort as a RAS notification. If it returns failure do_mem_abort() > will signal user-space too. > > do_mem_abort() wants to know if we handled the error, we always > call arm64_notify_die() so can always return success. > > Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com> Nit: Your 'RESEND V2' and 'V2' are not the same patch. 'RESEND' is to indicate you're reposting exactly the same patch, usually with a fixed CC list. Anyone who receives both can ignore one as you've said they are the same. Thanks, James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists