[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171212190410.yhgc7xplx4hwem2n@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:04:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 11/16] x86/ldt: Force access bit for CS/SS
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 07:41:39PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The pages are populated _before_ the new ldt is installed. So no memory
> pressure issue, nothing. If the populate fails, then modify_ldt() returns
> with an error.
Also, these pages are not visible to reclaim. They're not pagecache and
we didn't install a shrinker.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists