lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171212214432.GL3919388@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:44:32 -0800 From: "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org> To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com> Cc: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-team@...com" <kernel-team@...com>, "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>, "osandov@...com" <osandov@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme Hello, Bart. On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:37:11PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Have you considered the following instead of introducing MQ_RQ_IDLE and > MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT? I think this could help to limit the number of new atomic > operations introduced in the hot path by this patch series. But nothing in the hot paths is atomic. > static inline bool blk_mq_rq_in_flight(struct request *rq) > { > return list_empty(&rq->queuelist); > } And the fact that we encode the generation number and state into a single variable contributes to not needing atomic operations. Breaking up the state and generation like the above would need more synchronization, not less. Thanks. -- tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists