linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] clocksource: dmtimer: Remove all the exports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171212080134.GA9589@lenoch>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:01:34 +0100
From:   Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
To:     Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc:     daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com, aaro.koskinen@....fi,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, grygorii.strashko@...com,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        t-kristo@...com, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] clocksource: dmtimer: Remove all the exports

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:01:51PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 12 December 2017 12:46 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > Keerthy,
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:42:10AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> Remove all the unwanted exports from the driver
> > 
> > I'm adding event capture capability to the pwm-omap driver and so far used
> > v4.15-rc3 as codebase.
> > 
> > Intended use is an IR receiver; for that I need to measure pulses width and
> > spaces between pulses. So DM timer was setup to generate interupt after
> > both TCAR1 and TCAR2 are filled, values are passed to IR decoder and
> > TCAR_IT_FLAG is cleared.
> > 
> > Of course, this is just proof of concept and needs to be polished and
> > generalized, but to make it at least work I need functions you just
> > unexported (plus some new).
> > 
> > Question is whenever we need this level of indirection (omap_dm_timer_ops)
> > or plain exports are enough.
> 
> The general guidance is not to do plain exports and go via
> omap_dm_timer_ops.

...in contrary what other clocksource drivers are doing.

Now I'm assuming it is okay to extend omap_dm_timer_ops. That would mean
check for ops members to be assigned should be also extended or we should
delete it altogether and assume all members are populated?

Thanks,
	ladis