lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171212083343.GG22935@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:33:43 +0100 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, security@...nel.org, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> Subject: Re: general protection fault in show_timer On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:58:07AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > >> [cc security@] > >> 100% oops with interrupts disabled by nobody > >> or kernel memory read > >> [nods] > >> you named the bug already > >> > >> "notify" directly comes from userspace struct sigevent::sigev_notify > >> without adult supervision. > >> > >> Reproducer is timer_create + read(/proc/self/timers) > > > > Bah. That's a really old one. > > > > Tentative fix below. That needs more though but looking at the existing > > check there is only one valid combo with SIGEV_THREAD_ID. > > > > Thanks, > > > > tglx > > > > 8<---------------- > > --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c > > +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c > > @@ -434,6 +434,16 @@ static struct pid *good_sigevent(sigeven > > { > > struct task_struct *rtn = current->group_leader; > > > > + switch (event->sigev_notify) { > > + case SIGEV_NONE: > > + case SIGEV_SIGNAL: > > + case SIGEV_SIGNAL | SIGEV_THREAD_ID: > > + case SIGEV_THREAD: > > + break; > > + default: > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > if ((event->sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID ) && > > (!(rtn = find_task_by_vpid(event->sigev_notify_thread_id)) || > > !same_thread_group(rtn, current) || > > FWIW, this looks correct to me. Did this ever go anywhere? I don't see it in Linus's tree yet... thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists