lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <612bd427-c932-9fb4-5c9c-99941f0d8c01@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:11:30 +0800 From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com> To: aacraid@...ptec.com, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [BUG] drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o: a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in adpt_i2o_post_this According to drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c, the kernel module may sleep under a spinlock. The function call paths are: adpt_abort (acquire the spinlock) adpt_i2o_post_wait adpt_i2o_post_this schedule_timeout_uninterruptible--> may sleep adpt_device_reset (acquire the spinlock) adpt_i2o_post_wait adpt_i2o_post_this schedule_timeout_uninterruptible--> may sleep adpt_bus_reset (acquire the spinlock) adpt_i2o_post_wait adpt_i2o_post_this schedule_timeout_uninterruptible--> may sleep A possible fixing is to replace "schedule_timeout_uninterruptible" with "mdelay". If this fixing is correct, I can send a patch. This possible bug is found by my static analysis tool (DSAC) and checked by my code review. Thanks, Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists