lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:45:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 111/148] netfilter: dont track fragmented packets

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>


[ Upstream commit 7b4fdf77a450ec0fdcb2f677b080ddbf2c186544 ]

Andrey reports syzkaller splat caused by

NF_CT_ASSERT(!ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb)));

in ipv4 nat.  But this assertion (and the comment) are wrong, this function
does see fragments when IP_NODEFRAG setsockopt is used.

As conntrack doesn't track packets without complete l4 header, only the
first fragment is tracked.

Because applying nat to first packet but not the rest makes no sense this
also turns off tracking of all fragments.

Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c |    4 ++++
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c       |    5 -----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -158,6 +158,10 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_conntrack_local
 	if (skb->len < sizeof(struct iphdr) ||
 	    ip_hdrlen(skb) < sizeof(struct iphdr))
 		return NF_ACCEPT;
+
+	if (ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb))) /* IP_NODEFRAG setsockopt set */
+		return NF_ACCEPT;
+
 	return nf_conntrack_in(state->net, PF_INET, state->hook, skb);
 }
 
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -255,11 +255,6 @@ nf_nat_ipv4_fn(void *priv, struct sk_buf
 	/* maniptype == SRC for postrouting. */
 	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype = HOOK2MANIP(state->hook);
 
-	/* We never see fragments: conntrack defrags on pre-routing
-	 * and local-out, and nf_nat_out protects post-routing.
-	 */
-	NF_CT_ASSERT(!ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb)));
-
 	ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
 	/* Can't track?  It's not due to stress, or conntrack would
 	 * have dropped it.  Hence it's the user's responsibilty to


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ