linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 048/148] bus: arm-ccn: Fix use of smp_processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:44:18 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 048/148] bus: arm-ccn: Fix use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>

commit b18c2b9487d8e797fc0a757e57ac3645348c5fba upstream.

Booting a DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled kernel on a CCN-based system
results in the following splat:

[...]
arm-ccn e8000000.ccn: No access to interrupts, using timer.
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x28
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0 #6111
Hardware name: AMD Seattle/Seattle, BIOS 17:08:23 Jun 26 2017
Call trace:
[<ffff000008089e78>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x278
[<ffff00000808a22c>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[<ffff000008bc3bc4>] dump_stack+0x8c/0xb0
[<ffff00000852b534>] check_preemption_disabled+0xfc/0x100
[<ffff00000852b554>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x28
[<ffff000008551bd8>] arm_ccn_probe+0x358/0x4f0
[...]

as we use smp_processor_id() in the wrong context.

Turn this into a get_cpu()/put_cpu() that extends over the CPU hotplug
registration, making sure that we don't race against a CPU down operation.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
@@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_init(struct arm_c
 	}
 
 	/* Pick one CPU which we will use to collect data from CCN... */
-	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &ccn->dt.cpu);
+	cpumask_set_cpu(get_cpu(), &ccn->dt.cpu);
 
 	/* Also make sure that the overflow interrupt is handled by this CPU */
 	if (ccn->irq) {
@@ -1318,10 +1318,12 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_init(struct arm_c
 
 	cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CCN_ONLINE,
 					 &ccn->dt.node);
+	put_cpu();
 	return 0;
 
 error_pmu_register:
 error_set_affinity:
+	put_cpu();
 error_choose_name:
 	ida_simple_remove(&arm_ccn_pmu_ida, ccn->dt.id);
 	for (i = 0; i < ccn->num_xps; i++)