lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1513088442.26438.18.camel@baylibre.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:20:42 +0100 From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net: phy: meson-gxl: make function meson_gxl_read_status static On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 13:03 +0000, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> > > The function meson_gxl_read_status is local to the source and does > not need to be in global scope, so make it static. > > Cleans up sparse warning: > symbol 'meson_gxl_read_status' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> Indeed, silly mistake, thx for spotting it. Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists