[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 16:23:59 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
sagar.a.kamble@...el.com, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...el.com,
seanpaul@...omium.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: fix, intel_guc_loader.c has been moved to
intel_guc_fw.c
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:11:43PM +0100, Markus Heiser wrote:
>
> > Am 12.12.2017 um 13:05 schrieb Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:38:37 +0100, Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de> wrote:
> >
> >> With commit d9e2e0143c the 'GuC-specific firmware loader' doc
> >> section was removed from intel_guc_loader.c without a
> >> replacement. So lets remove it from the Kernel-doc::
> >>
> >> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> >> :doc: GuC-specific firmware loader
> >>
> >> With commit e8668bbcb0 intel_guc_loader.c was renamed to to
> >> intel_guc_fw.c and to name just one, intel_guc_init_hw() was
> >> renamed to intel_guc_fw_upload(). Since we get errors in the
> >> Sphinx build like:
> >>
> >> - Error: Cannot open file ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> >>
> >> Change the kernel-doc directive from intel_guc_loader.c to
> >> intel_guc_fw.c
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
> >> ---
> >
> > Thanks for your patch, but similar fix is already merged here [1]
> >
> > Michal
> >
> > [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/commit/?id=006c23327f8de8575508c458131b304188d426f7
>
>
> Thanks for pointing out. I miss the ":doc: GuC-specific firmware loader"
> fix in that patch (doc section was removed in d9e2e0143c). Can you or
> someone else from @intel fix this also?
I've rebased the patch from you to only take that remaining part.
Thanks for fixing this.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists