[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:49:32 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: schmitzmic@...il.com, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NCR5380: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in
NCR5380_poll_politely2
Thanks for your reply :)
On 2017/12/12 11:38, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>> From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>>
>> The kernel module may sleep under a spinlock.
> The spinlock is always taken in irq mode, and the
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() is conditional on !irqs_disabled().
>
I think I ignore this check, which causes a false bug report, sorry.
Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists