linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arch: define weak abort

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1513094225.4945.6.camel@synopsys.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:57:06 +0000
From:   Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:     "sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: define weak abort

Hi Sudip,

On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 21:26 +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> gcc was generating abort due to 'divide by zero' and if it is not
> defined in the toolchain the build fails.
> 
> Currently 'frv' and 'arc' are failing. Previously other arch was also
> broken like m32r was fixed by d22e3d69ee1a ("m32r: fix build failure").

Why don't we revert mentioned d22e3d69ee1a ("m32r: fix build failure")
if not in the same patch but in the series together with this one?

-Alexey