linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add topology parsing code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fc12696c-15e1-cea4-42bf-db4b5daa45f2@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:13:08 -0600
From:   Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        jhugo@...eaurora.org, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
        Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com, ahs3@...hat.com,
        Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
        lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add topology parsing code

Hi,

First, thanks for taking a look at this.

On 12/11/2017 07:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 1, 2017 11:23:27 PM CET Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> The PPTT can be used to determine the groupings of CPU's at
>> given levels in the system. Lets add a few routines to the PPTT
>> parsing code to return a unique id for each unique level in the
>> processor hierarchy. This can then be matched to build
>> thread/core/cluster/die/package/etc mappings for each processing
>> element in the system.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> 
> Why can't this be folded into patch [2/9]?

It can, and I will be happy squash it.

It was requested that the topology portion of the parser be split out 
back in v3.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg78487.html