[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A3152C4.4070802@gaisler.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:18:12 +0100
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org
CC: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] drivers/gpio: some possible sleep-in-atomic bugs
On 2017-12-12 04:59, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> According to drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c, the kernel module may sleep
> under a spinlock.
> The function call paths are:
> grgpio_remove (acquire the spinlock)
> gpiochip_remove
> gpiochip_sysfs_unregister
> device_unregister --> may sleep
> mutex_lock --> may sleep
>
> grgpio_remove (acquire the spinlock)
> gpiochip_remove
> gpiochip_sysfs_unregister
> gpiod_free
> __gpiod_free
> gpiod_unexport
> device_unregister --> may sleep
> mutex_lock --> may sleep
>
> grgpio_remove (acquire the spinlock)
> irq_domain_remove
> mutex_lock --> may sleep
>
> grgpio_irq_map (acquire the spinlock)
> request_irq --> may sleep
>
> grgpio_irq_unmap (acquire the spinlock)
> free_irq --> may sleep
>
>
> I do not find a good way to fix them, so I only report.
> These possible bugs is found by my static analysis tool (DSAC) and
> checked by my code review.
Hi!
Thank you for reporting this. I will take a look at it.
--
Best Regards,
Andreas Larsson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists