| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171213180217.GB4060@red-moon>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:02:17 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, jhugo@...eaurora.org,
wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com,
ahs3@...hat.com, Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com,
austinwc@...eaurora.org, lenb@...nel.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: Topology, rename cluster_id
[+Morten, Dietmar]
$SUBJECT should be:
arm64: topology: rename cluster_id
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:23:28PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Lets match the name of the arm64 topology field
> to the kernel macro that uses it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> index c4f2d50491eb..118136268f66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -7,14 +7,14 @@
> struct cpu_topology {
> int thread_id;
> int core_id;
> - int cluster_id;
> + int physical_id;
package_id ?
It has been debated before, I know. Should we keep the cluster_id too
(even if it would be 1:1 mapped to package_id - for now) ?
There is also arch/arm to take into account, again, this patch is
just renaming (as it should have named since the beginning) a
topology level but we should consider everything from a legacy
perspective.
Lorenzo
> cpumask_t thread_sibling;
> cpumask_t core_sibling;
> };
>
> extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>
> -#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id)
> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id)
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)
> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 8d48b233e6ce..74a8a5173a35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> return -1;
> }
>
> -static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> +static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int physical_id,
> int core_id)
> {
> char name[10];
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> leaf = false;
> cpu = get_cpu_for_node(t);
> if (cpu >= 0) {
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = i;
> } else {
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
> } else if (leaf) {
> pr_err("%pOF: Can't get CPU for leaf core\n", core);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> bool leaf = true;
> bool has_cores = false;
> struct device_node *c;
> - static int cluster_id __initdata;
> + static int physical_id __initdata;
> int core_id = 0;
> int i, ret;
>
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> }
>
> if (leaf) {
> - ret = parse_core(c, cluster_id, core_id++);
> + ret = parse_core(c, physical_id, core_id++);
> } else {
> pr_err("%pOF: Non-leaf cluster with core %s\n",
> cluster, name);
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
> pr_warn("%pOF: empty cluster\n", cluster);
>
> if (leaf)
> - cluster_id++;
> + physical_id++;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int __init parse_dt_topology(void)
> * only mark cores described in the DT as possible.
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> - if (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id == -1)
> + if (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id == -1)
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> out_map:
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != cpu_topo->cluster_id)
> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != cpu_topo->physical_id)
> continue;
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> u64 mpidr;
>
> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != -1)
> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != -1)
> goto topology_populated;
>
> mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> @@ -263,19 +263,19 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> /* Multiprocessor system : Multi-threads per core */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 8;
> } else {
> /* Multiprocessor system : Single-thread per core */
> cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) << 8 |
> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 16;
> }
>
> pr_debug("CPU%u: cluster %d core %d thread %d mpidr %#016llx\n",
> - cpuid, cpuid_topo->cluster_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> + cpuid, cpuid_topo->physical_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> cpuid_topo->thread_id, mpidr);
>
> topology_populated:
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
>
> cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
> cpu_topo->core_id = 0;
> - cpu_topo->cluster_id = -1;
> + cpu_topo->physical_id = -1;
>
> cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
> }
> }
>
> +
> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> reset_cpu_topology();
> --
> 2.13.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists