[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0326a5b-1be8-c3be-9c42-2d3677d52239@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:30:04 +0000
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][mtd-next] mtd: nand: remove redundant check of len
On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +0000
> Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> The check of len being zero is redundant as it has already been
>> sanity checked for this value at the start of the function. Hence
>> it is impossible for this test to be true and so the redundant
>> code can be removed.
>
> Nope, it's not the same test, the initial test is
>
> if (len && !buf)
Ah, the current tip from linux-next has:
1912 if (!len || !buf)
1913 return -EINVAL;
..so I guess that's why it got picked up by static analysis.
>
> not
>
> if (len)
>
> So this test is not redundant.
>
>>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462748 ("Logically dead code")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>> index afd5e18db81c..9daaa23db943 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>> @@ -1507,10 +1507,6 @@ static int nand_read_param_page_op(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 page, void *buf,
>> };
>> struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);
>>
>> - /* Drop the DATA_IN instruction if len is set to 0. */
>> - if (!len)
>> - op.ninstrs--;
>> -
>> return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists