lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213215925.GJ30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:59:25 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kishon@...com,
        Niklas Cassel <niklass@...s.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix find_first_zero_bit() usage

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:16:31PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> find_first_zero_bit()'s parameter 'size' is defined in bits,
> not in bytes.
> 
> Calling find_first_zero_bit() with the wrong size unit
> will lead to insidious bugs.
> 
> Fix all uses of find_first_zero_bit() called with
> sizeof() as size argument in drivers/pci.
> 
> Also had to fix broken error handling in pci_epc_epf_link()
> in order to do proper error handling for find_first_zero_bit().
> 
> Niklas Cassel (3):
>   PCI: designware-ep: Fix find_first_zero_bit() usage
>   PCI: endpoint: Fix error handling in pci_epc_epf_link()
>   PCI: endpoint: Fix find_first_zero_bit() usage
> 
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h    |  8 ++++++--
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c    | 13 ++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

In the interest of making forward progress, I applied these to
for-linus for v4.15.

The issues apparently have been there since v4.12-rc1, but I guess
this is proposed for for-linus because (a) it fixes insidious bugs
and (b) the endpoint framework is relatively little-used yet so
low-risk.  Right?

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ