lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:07:30 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych@...il.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, Fix use resource_size

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:19:55AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, December 11, 2017 4:44:31 PM CET Vasyl Gomonovych wrote:
>> > Use resource_size function on resource object
>> > Underneath __request_region set res->end to start + n - 1
>> > Lets use resourse_size to set value properly.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych@...il.com>
>>
>> Boris, what do you think?
>
> So if MAINTAINERS says we review apei stuff, it doesn't mean that you
> should completely stop doing that! :-P

Which is exactly why you've got this question at all. ;-)

> So this looks like a fix to me since it didn't do the + 1 before.
>
> I don't believe this would break any APEI stuff but it should be tested
> a little just in case.

OK, let's queue it up for 4.16, then.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ