lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 01:58:27 +0000
From:   alexander.levin@...izon.com
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        alexander.levin@...izon.com
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.4 07/59] crypto: deadlock between
 crypto_alg_sem/rtnl_mutex/genl_mutex

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

[ Upstream commit 8a0f5ccfb33b0b8b51de65b7b3bf342ba10b4fb6 ]

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:44:10AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> Yes, please.
> Disregarding some reports is not a good way long term.

Please try this patch.

---8<---
Subject: netlink: Annotate nlk cb_mutex by protocol

Currently all occurences of nlk->cb_mutex are annotated by lockdep
as a single class.  This causes a false lcokdep cycle involving
genl and crypto_user.

This patch fixes it by dividing cb_mutex into individual classes
based on the netlink protocol.  As genl and crypto_user do not
use the same netlink protocol this breaks the false dependency
loop.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
---
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index a87afc4f3c91..5fabe68e20dd 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -96,6 +96,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nl_table);
 
 static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(nl_table_wait);
 
+static struct lock_class_key nlk_cb_mutex_keys[MAX_LINKS];
+
+static const char *const nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[MAX_LINKS + 1] = {
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-1",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-USERSOCK",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-FIREWALL",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-SOCK_DIAG",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-NFLOG",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-XFRM",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-SELINUX",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-ISCSI",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-AUDIT",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-FIB_LOOKUP",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-CONNECTOR",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-NETFILTER",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-IP6_FW",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-DNRTMSG",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-KOBJECT_UEVENT",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-17",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-SCSITRANSPORT",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-ECRYPTFS",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-RDMA",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-CRYPTO",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-SMC",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-23",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-24",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-25",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-26",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-27",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-28",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-29",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-30",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-31",
+	"nlk_cb_mutex-MAX_LINKS"
+};
+
 static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk);
 static void netlink_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb);
 
@@ -585,6 +623,9 @@ static int __netlink_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 	} else {
 		nlk->cb_mutex = &nlk->cb_def_mutex;
 		mutex_init(nlk->cb_mutex);
+		lockdep_set_class_and_name(nlk->cb_mutex,
+					   nlk_cb_mutex_keys + protocol,
+					   nlk_cb_mutex_key_strings[protocol]);
 	}
 	init_waitqueue_head(&nlk->wait);
 
-- 
2.11.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ