[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CyNbKckyu2kD4Dtw-tsv0Nb4S0rDtf7T-tLMrY6mpfHWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:11:08 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Fix host dr6 miss restore
2017-12-12 23:08 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
> On 10/12/2017 01:44, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> 2017-12-08 20:39 GMT+08:00 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>:
>>> On 08.12.2017 10:12, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Reported by syzkaller:
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12927 at arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:780 do_debug+0x222/0x250
>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 12927 Comm: syz-executor Tainted: G OE 4.15.0-rc2+ #16
>>>> RIP: 0010:do_debug+0x222/0x250
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> <#DB>
>>>> debug+0x3e/0x70
>>>> RIP: 0010:copy_user_enhanced_fast_string+0x10/0x20
>>>> </#DB>
>>>> _copy_from_user+0x5b/0x90
>>>> SyS_timer_create+0x33/0x80
>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a
>>>>
>>>> The syzkaller will mmap a buffer which is also the struct sigevent parameter of
>>>> timer_create(), it will also call perf_event_open() to set a BP for the buffer,
>>>> so when the implementation of timer_create() in kernel tries to get the struct
>>>> sigevent parameter by copy_from_user(), rep movsb triggers the BP. The syzkaller
>>>> testcase also sets the debug registers for the guest, however, the kvm just
>>>> restores host debug registers when we have active breakpoints. I can observe
>>>> the dr6 single step bit is set and !hw_breakpoint_active() sporadically by print
>>>> when running the testcase heavy multithreading. The do_debug() which is triggered
>>>> by rep movsb will splash when (dr6 & DR_STEP && !user_mode(regs)).
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes it by restoring host dr6 unconditionally before preempt/irq
>>>> enable.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 ++
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> index 0c5d55c..a6370fd 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> @@ -7065,6 +7065,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>> */
>>>> if (hw_breakpoint_active())
>>>> hw_breakpoint_restore();
>>>> + else
>>>> + set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6);
>>>>
>>>> vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you haven't seen it, I analyzed this in
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/7/638 but nobody would respond for now to
>>> my suggestion/question.
>>
>> I think it's fine to restore dr6 before preempt/irq enable.
>
> If no breakpoint is active, you should be able to restore it only in
> sched_out.
Do it in v2. :)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists