[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213064936.GC7780@xz-mi>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:49:36 +0800
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, aik@...abs.ru,
kwankhede@...dia.com, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Simplify capability helper
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:59:39PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The vfio_info_add_capability() helper requires the caller to pass a
> capability ID, which it then uses to fill in header fields, assuming
> hard coded versions. This makes for an awkward and rigid interface.
> The only thing we want this helper to do is allocate sufficient
> space in the caps buffer and chain this capability into the list.
> Reduce it to that simple task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Though during review I had a question related to the function
msix_sparse_mmap_cap(): Is it possible that one PCI device BAR is very
small (e.g., 4K) that only contains the MSI-X table (and another small
PBA area)? If so, should we just mark that region unmappable instead
of setting vfio_region_info_cap_sparse_mmap.nr_areas to 1 in
msix_sparse_mmap_cap()?
/* If MSI-X table is aligned to the start or end, only one area */
if (((vdev->msix_offset & PAGE_MASK) == 0) ||
(PAGE_ALIGN(vdev->msix_offset + vdev->msix_size) >= end))
nr_areas = 1;
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists