[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213072146.7zbledeffvwskxx6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:21:47 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, yu-cheng.yu@...el.com,
len.brown@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com,
pombredanne@...b.com, me@...ehuey.com, bp@...e.de,
grzegorz.andrejczuk@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, corbet@....net,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] perf/x86/intel/bm.c: Add Intel Branch Monitoring
support
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:08:00PM -0800, Megha Dey wrote:
> >
> > There's work on the way to allow multiple HW PMUs. You'll either have to
> > wait for that or help in making that happen. What you do not do is
> > silently hack around it.
>
> Could I get a pointer to the code implementing this?
>
There isn't much code now; but it could be build on top of the stuff
here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core
It was mostly Mark I think who wanted this for big litte stuffs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists