linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171213090623.GV25177@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:36:23 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE
 enter

On 12-12-17, 15:16, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> Since you are already changing some flags position, maybe we can have
> a better organization by using lower flags for "general bits" and
> higher ones for class specific, i.e.
> 
> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_CLEAR	(1U <<  0)
> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT	(1U <<  1)
> 
> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_CFS	(1U <<  8)
> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT	(1U <<  9)
> #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL	(1U << 10)

Since we aren't normally going to add any more of class specific ones, I would
like to keep them as 0, 1 and 2. And using the top most bit for CLEAR seems
better to me somehow, just like the signed bit for 32 bit integers.

-- 
viresh