[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213104139.65396b1c.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:41:39 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: introduce kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:35:57 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> After the vcpu_load/vcpu_put pushdown, the handling of asynchronous VCPU
> ioctl is already much clearer in that it is obvious that they bypass
> vcpu_load and vcpu_put.
>
> However, it is still not perfect in that the different state of the VCPU
> mutex is still hidden in the caller. Separate those ioctls into a new
> function kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl that returns -ENOIOCTLCMD for more
> "traditional" synchronous ioctls.
>
> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 11 +++++++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 12 +++++-------
> 8 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Using HAVE_KVM_VCPU_ASYNC_IOCTL looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists