[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213111346.GC30887@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:13:46 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
tkjos@...roid.com, joelaf@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Initialize sg_cpu->flags to 0
Hi Viresh,
On 13/12/17 15:23, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Initializing sg_cpu->flags to SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT has no obvious benefit.
> The flags field wouldn't be used until the utilization update handler is
> called for the first time, and once that is called we will overwrite
> flags anyway.
>
> Initialize it to 0.
>
> Change-Id: I028dbb40c5c242cff52fe1b14aeaff37f29a2f8d
Without ^
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Best,
- Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists