lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213114728.GB21746@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:47:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: rtl8723bs: make memcmp() calls consistent

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 08:35:12PM +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> rtw_pm_set() uses memcmp() with 5-chars strings and a length of 4 when
> parsing extra, and then parses extra+4 as an int:
> 
>     if (!memcmp(extra, "lps =", 4)) {
>         sscanf(extra+4, "%u", &mode);
>     /* ... */
>     } else if (!memcmp(extra, "ips =", 4)) {
>         sscanf(extra+4, "%u", &mode);
> 
> The space between the key ("lps" and "ips") and the equal sign seems
> suspicious. Remove it in order to make the calls to memcmp() consistent.

But you now just changing the parsing logic.  What broke because of
this?  Did you test this codepath with your patch?

I'm not disagreeing that this code seems really odd, but it must be
working as-is for someone, to change this logic will break their system
:(

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ