[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213125739.fllckbl3o4nonmpx@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:57:40 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 05/16] mm: Allow special mappings with user access cleared
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:22:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:00:08AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > From: Peter Zijstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > >
> > > In order to create VMAs that are not accessible to userspace create a new
> > > VM_NOUSER flag. This can be used in conjunction with
> > > install_special_mapping() to inject 'kernel' data into the userspace map.
> > >
> > > Similar to how arch_vm_get_page_prot() allows adding _PAGE_flags to
> > > pgprot_t, introduce arch_vm_get_page_prot_excl() which masks
> > > _PAGE_flags from pgprot_t and use this to implement VM_NOUSER for x86.
> >
> > How does this interact with get_user_pages(), etc?
>
> So I went through that code and I think I found a bug related to this.
>
> get_user_pages_fast() will ultimately end up doing
> pte_access_permitted() before getting the page, follow_page OTOH does
> not do this, which makes for a curious difference between the two.
>
> So I'm thinking we want the below irrespective of the VM_NOUSER patch,
> but with VM_NOUSER it would mean write(2) will no longer be able to
> access the page.
Oh..
We do call pte_access_permitted(), but only for write access.
See can_follow_write_pte().
The issue seems bigger: we also need such calls for other page table levels :-/
Dave, what is effect of this on protection keys?
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index dfcde13f289a..b852f37a2b0c 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,11 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
>
> if (flags & FOLL_GET) {
> + if (!pte_access_permitted(pte, !!(flags & FOLL_WRITE))) {
> + page = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> get_page(page);
>
> /* drop the pgmap reference now that we hold the page */
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists