linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce MAP_FIXED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:01:35 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce MAP_FIXED_SAFE

On Wed 13-12-17 04:50:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -1342,6 +1342,10 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> >  		if (!(file && path_noexec(&file->f_path)))
> >  			prot |= PROT_EXEC;
> >  
> > +	/* force arch specific MAP_FIXED handling in get_unmapped_area */
> > +	if (flags & MAP_FIXED_SAFE)
> > +		flags |= MAP_FIXED;
> > +
> >  	if (!(flags & MAP_FIXED))
> >  		addr = round_hint_to_min(addr);
> >  
> 
> We're up to 22 MAP_ flags now.  We'll run out soon.  Let's preserve half
> of a flag by giving userspace the definition:
> 
> #define MAP_FIXED_SAFE	(MAP_FIXED | _MAP_NOT_HINT)

I've already tried to explain why this cannot be a modifier for
MAP_FIXED. Read about the backward compatibility note...
Or do I misunderstand what you are saying here?
 
> then in here:
> 
> 	if ((flags & _MAP_NOT_HINT) && !(flags & MAP_FIXED))
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Now we can use _MAP_NOT_HINT all by itself in the future to mean
> something else.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs