[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513174959.2879.32.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:22:39 +0200
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] kernel/reboot.c: export pm_power_off_prepare
On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 06:36 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>
> On 07.12.2017 00:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > void (*pm_power_off_prepare)(void);
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off_prepare);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for something this deeply internal, please.
> Ok,
> probably all other symbols should be converted in this file in to
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL as well?
>
> grep EXPORT_SYMBOL kernel/reboot.c
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cad_pid);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_power_off_prepare);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(emergency_restart);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_reboot_notifier);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_reboot_notifier);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_register_reboot_notifier);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_restart_handler);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_restart_handler);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_restart);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_halt);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_power_off);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(orderly_poweroff);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(orderly_reboot);
This call looks much more deeply internal than those other functions,
it's not like reboot_notifier and restart_handler.
It seems that the only user of pm_power_off_prepare right now is the
ACPI core and your patch uses it in a regulator driver. This looks
extremely strange. Maybe this is why imx maintainers are stalling on
this patch?
It might help if the ACPI/PM maintainers ack/review this part
explicitly, and the usage in part 5:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9799615/
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists