[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bb4e51a-6fd2-e946-8927-b8d9fe491b07@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:04:48 +0100
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, aik@...abs.ru,
kwankhede@...dia.com, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Simplify capability helper
Hi Peter,
On 13/12/17 07:49, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:59:39PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> The vfio_info_add_capability() helper requires the caller to pass a
>> capability ID, which it then uses to fill in header fields, assuming
>> hard coded versions. This makes for an awkward and rigid interface.
>> The only thing we want this helper to do is allocate sufficient
>> space in the caps buffer and chain this capability into the list.
>> Reduce it to that simple task.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
>
> Though during review I had a question related to the function
> msix_sparse_mmap_cap(): Is it possible that one PCI device BAR is very
> small (e.g., 4K) that only contains the MSI-X table (and another small
> PBA area)? If so, should we just mark that region unmappable instead
> of setting vfio_region_info_cap_sparse_mmap.nr_areas to 1 in
> msix_sparse_mmap_cap()?
>
> /* If MSI-X table is aligned to the start or end, only one area */
> if (((vdev->msix_offset & PAGE_MASK) == 0) ||
> (PAGE_ALIGN(vdev->msix_offset + vdev->msix_size) >= end))
> nr_areas = 1;
>
> Thanks,
>
if I understand the code correctly, if the MSI-X table exactly matches
the BAR, a sparse mmap region is reported with offset/size = 0. Is that
correct?
Thanks
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists